Summary. 1

Anti-NMDAR encephalitis. 2

Epidemiology. 2

Pathogenesis. 2

Clinical Features. 3

Investigations. 5

Differential diagnosis. 6

Management 6

Prognosis. 7

References. 8

Anti-VGKC Encephalitis. 8

Anti-GAD.. 8

Stiff-Person Syndrome and PERM.. 8

Anti-GABAB Receptor Antibodies. 8

Anti-DPPX. 9

 

Summary

 

 

 

 

 

 

NMDAR

 

 

VGKC

 

 

-       LgI1

 

 

-       CASPR2

 

 

GABAbR

 

 

GABAaR

 

 

GlyR

 

 

mGluR5, mGluR1

 

 

IgLON5

 

 

Neurexin3a

 

 

D2R

 

 

DPPX

 

 

GAD

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hu, Ri

 

 

Ma1/Ma2

 

 

PCA2

 

 

Yo

 

 

CV2/CRMP5

 

 

Recoverin

 

 

AGNA

 

 

DNER

 

 

ANNA 3

 

 

ZIC 4

 

 

Amphiphysin

 

 

 

 

 

Anti-NMDAR encephalitis

   First recognised as a specific autoimmune condition in 2005

   ‘Four young women who developed acute psychiatric symptoms, seizures, memory deficits, decreased level of consciousness and central hypoventilation associated with ovarian teratoma and CSF inflammatory  abnormalities

Epidemiology

   Women ~80%

   Age

o    Very rare after age 40

o    Peak 18-30years

o    Patients with tumour on average a bit older

Tumour association

   Tumours found in ~50% of patients – overall

   Adult women        - 60%

   Children               - 10%

   Men                     -  5% (testicular germ-cell, SCLC, lymphoma)

 

   Mostly ovarian teratomas (>90%)

   Express NMDAR (100% of 25 tumours studied)

 

Pathogenesis

   Glutamate- principal excitatory neurotransmitter in CNS

   There are 3 ionotrophic glutamate receptors

o    AMPA

o    NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate)

o    KA

   NMDA receptor antagonists

o    Ketamine and PCP - Hallucinations, paranoia, sedation, seizures

   Excess activation of neurons by excitatory neurotransmitters – particularly glutamate implicated in neuronal death – excitotoxicity 

 

   Autoantibodies against NMDAr (subunit NR1)

   Internalisation of NMDA receptor and reduced synaptic density of NMDA receptor

 

 

Clinical Features

   Tend to have a usual course of onset and progression:

Prodrome (?70%)

<2 weeks prior

Headache, fever

Nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea

URTI

Psychiatric

Anxiety, fear, delusions

Mania, Paranoia

Cognitive

Short-term memory loss

Language impairment

Seizures

Complex partial

Altered consciousness

Catatonia

Abnormal movements

Oro-lingual-facial dyskinesia

Dystonia

Autonomic instability

Hyperthermia, tachycardia, hypotension

Hypoventilation

Full or nocturnal ventilation

 

Symptoms at 1 month post onset (Lancet Neurol 2013)

 

Psychosis

   Psychosis  (Zandi et al. J Neurol 2011)

o    Prospective study of patients presenting with new-onset psychosis in the UK.

o    46 patients – 2 positive for NMDAR Abs, 1 VGKC Ab’s

o    ~ 6.5% with potentially treatable cause

 

Epilepsy

   Arch Neurol 2009 – Dalmau, Vincent, Bien

   847 women with epilepsy presenting to tertiary hospital in Germany.

   19 had ‘unexplained’, new-onset epilepsy

   5 had NMDAR antibodies

   0.6% of all epilepsy in women

   26%  of ‘unexplained’, new-onset epilepsy in women

 

   Clinical Course

   Natural history highly variable

   4 cases diagnosed prior to role for immunotherapy known

   Gradual recovery – mean 7months in hospital, 2 patients required >3 yrs to fully recover.

   Mortality 4% (mixed group with variable treatment)

    

Relapses

   25% of untreated patients at 2 years

   7-10% of treated patients at 2 years

   Up to 7yrs post initial episode

   Risk factors for relapse

o    No immunotherapy at first episode

o    No tumour

 

Investigations

Imaging

   MRI

o    Abnormal in 35-50%

o    A range of transient non-specific changes +/- subtle contrast enhancement

   PET/SPECT

o    Variable, multi-focal cortical and subcortical changes

EEG

   Abnormal in most – but non-specific

   Generalised slowing                     ~80%

   Epileptiform discharges                ~50%

   Seizures (occasional focal status)

   Extreme delta brush (possibly quite specific) – delta waves with brush like beta on the crests of the delta waves.  Present in ~30% of adults with disease.

CSF analysis

   Initially abnormal in ~80%, becomes abnormal in most

   Mild/Moderate lymphocytic pleocytosis      70-90%

   Normal or mildly increased protein             ~30%

   Oligoclonal bands                                     ~60%

   NMDAr Abs                                              100%**

Brain biopsy

   not diagnostic     

   Normal or non-specific inflammatory changes

NMDAr antibody testing

   Cell culture based assay:

o    Perth, Pathwest, cost ~$21/test

o    Can do CSF and serum

o    Could do a semi-quantitative titre on special request

   Sensitivity - Good in acute disease

o    ?delayed presentation or retrospective diagnosis

   Specificity - Probably excellent

o    Some low level elevation in neurological control patients – particularly in serum

o    It is probable that previous, asymptomatic, exposure to HSV may result in NMDA antibodies in serum

   10% are found in CSF only

 

Differential diagnosis

“Encephalitis” - Confusion/amnesia/altered conscious state +/-  seizures

Infectious (HSV, VZV, JE, TB…)

Seizures –e.g. temporal lobe epilepsy

Drugs/Toxins

Demyelinating - ADEM

Autoimmune

Traditional Paraneoplastic (‘limbic encephalitis’)

Hashimoto’s encephalopathy

‘New channel-opathies’ – NMDA, VGKC

 

NMDA’s cousins…

   AMPAR antibody encephalitis

   Presenting as limbic encephalitis

   Female patients with a variety of tumours

   Respond well to tumour treatment and immunotherapy

   NMDA’s cousins…

   Anti –VGKC antibody disease

   Seizures – faciobrachial

   Limbic encephalitis (Dense amnesia, confusion, hallucinations,  depression)

   Hyponatraemia

   No major tumour association; respond to immunotherapy

   LGI1 and CASPR2 antigens

 

 

Management

Investigate for tumour

   Investigation for and removal of teratoma

   ? Presence of micro-tumour – prophylactic oophrectomy

   Tumour surveillance 1-2years

 

Immunomodulatory treatment

First Line:

   IVIG/plasma exchange + Methylprednisolone (5 doses of each)

   Evaluate after ~2 weeks – if response then consider repeating treatment after 1 month

 

If no response 2nd line therapies:

   Cyclophosphamide 750mg/m2 – monthly for 6 months

   and Rituximab 375mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks

   Check for B-cell depletion at 2 weeks after Rituximab dose – if not sufficient give a further 2 doses

   If less than 16 years old start with rituximab only and see if cyclophosphamide can be avoided.

 

Long term immunosuppression

   ? Azathioprine,  Mycophenolate

   No evidence

 

Psychiatric/behavioural

   Issues of competence and safety

   Will often need periods of chemical or physical restraint

   No evidence regarding specific anti-psychotic or sedative agents

   What is the role of ECT in patients who don’t rapidly recover with immune therapy? (case report of one patient with a good response)

Prognosis

Outcomes with treatment

~75% Good outcome

~21% Ongoing disability

4% mortality

 

Better prognosis if:

Paraneoplastic cause (and tumour removed)

Immunotherapy early (< 40days from onset)

Use of more combination immunotherapy (rather than steroids alone)

Prognosis (mRS scale) x-axis is months from diagnosis

 

References

Dalmau J et al, Clinical experience and laboratory investigations in patients with antiNMDAR encephalitis, Lancet Neurol 2011; 10: 63-74

Bataller L et al, Autoimmune limbic encephalitis in 39 patients: Immunophenotypes and outcomes, JNNP published online 15 Sep 2006 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2006.100644

Florance N et al, AntiNMDAR encephalitis in children and adolescents, Ann Neurol 2009; 66: 11-18

Pruss et al, Retrospective analysis of NMDA receptor antiboides in encephalitis of unknown origin, Neurology 2010; 75:1735-39

Dalmau et al, Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: case series and analysis of the effects of antibodies, Lancet Neurol 2008; 7:1091-98

Vincent A and C Bien, Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis:a cause of psychiatric, seizure and movement disorders in young adults, Lancet Neurol 2008; 7:1074-5

Honnorat J, Autoimmune limbic encephalitis;An expanding concept, Lancet Neurol 2009; 9:25-25

Vedeler CA and A Storstein, Autoimmune limbic encephalitis, Acta Neurol Scand 2009; 120 (Suppl 189):63-67

Kalia LV, S Kalia and M Salter, NMDA receptors in clinical neurology:excitory times ahead, Lancet Neurol 2008; 7:742-55

Vincent A, S Irani and B Lang, The growing recognition of immunotherapy responsive seizure disorders with autoantibodies with specific neuronal proteins, Current opinion in Neurology 2010; 23:144-150

Gabilondo et al. Analysis of relapses in anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Neurology 2011; 77:996-999

 

 

Anti-VGKC Encephalitis

Diagnosis

·         85% of Anti-VGKC are ‘false positive’

·         LGi1 and CASPER2 (subset of Anti-VGKC) are highly specific for disease

Imaging

50% of patients found to have T1 hyperintensity in the caudate head

Anti-GAD

 

Stiff-Person Syndrome and PERM

PERM

Antibodies:

DPPX (Dipeptidyl peptidase-like protein 6)

·         Extracellular component of neuronal Kv4.2 potassium channels

·         Neurology 2014 82(17) pg1521

Anti-GABAB Receptor Antibodies

   Only a few small case reports

   Lennon’s Mayo clinic group (Jerffery wt al. Neurology 2013) found 17 patients

o    0.2% of samples sent for autoimmune encephalopathy

o    10% of samples which had previously been classified as unknown autoimmune encephalopathy (based on hippocampal staining)

o    1.3% of samples which contained other SCLC antibodies

o    The majority of patients had limbic encephalitis

o    The majority had SCLC 

   Dalmau’s group (Hoftberger et al., Neurology 2013) screened serum and CSF from ~9000 patients referred with possible autoimmune encephalitis or paraneoplastic syndromes.

o    20 patients were identified

o    10 had SCLC, 10 had no cancer

o    The majority presented with a limbic encephalitis

o    One patient had ataxia, one opsoclonus-myoclonus

o    15 of the patients had some response to immunotherapy – more so in the non-cancer group.

o    One patient had NMDARA (and more psychiatric symptoms), one patient had anti-GAD (and had more seizures).

o    The same paper suggested the anti-bodies were causing blockade of the receptor (rather than internalisation)

 

Hoftberger et al. 2013 Neurology Vol 81 pg1500

 

Anti-DPPX

   Stiff-Person syndrome and PERM

   Case reports of